This resource is designed to assist individuals who are applying for tenure, promotion, an academic position, teaching award, or teaching innovation grant, and those preparing for non-decision year review.
The structure and categories of evidence suggested in this resource are derived from a literature review; the teaching dossier guidelines offered at other Canadian universities; the documentation required for 3M National Teaching Fellowship nominations; and the scholarship on the evaluation of teaching effectiveness published by the Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning at the University of Calgary. The categories of evidence are also compliant with the Canadian Association of University Teachers’ (CAUT) Teaching Dossier (2018) publication. The current Collective Agreement between Memorial University of Newfoundland and Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty Association recommends faculty follow the suggestions in the CAUT Teaching Dossier (2018) document for promotion and tenure processes.
Suggested Framework
The list below represents a suggested table of contents for a teaching dossier. It provides a framework for preparing a descriptive narrative about the scope, quality, and development of your teaching practice and for selecting evidence to support the claims you make about your teaching and its impact on student learning.
Title Page
Table of Contents
Preface/Introduction
- Teaching Responsibility
- Courses taught
- Student supervision
- Teaching Philosophy
- Effectiveness in Teaching and Learning
- Teaching strategies
- Methods of student assessment
- Course and instructional materials developed
- New course development and course redesign
- Evaluation of and feedback on courses and teaching
- Teaching awards and recognitions
- Professional Learning and Development in Teaching
- Scholarship in Teaching and Learning
- Educational Leadership Philosophy
- Teaching Leadership and Service
- Service in academic administration
- Service on committees related to teaching and learning
- Curriculum development
- Contribution to the professional development of colleagues
- Mentoring of new faculty and other colleagues
- Community education
- Teaching Goals
Appendices
Framework Sections
Section 3.2 of the CAUT Teaching Dossier (2018) publication, “Possible items for a teaching dossier”, lists a number of artifacts that may be included in your teaching dossier to provide evidence of the statements you make about your teaching. The numbers in brackets in the “Examples of evidence” below correspond to the item numbers in section 3.2 and indicate items that may be appropriate in providing evidence for the section or category in which they appear.
Preface/Introduction
Begin the dossier by briefly introducing yourself and your teaching experience. State why you have prepared the dossier and say what you hope reviewers will conclude about you as a teacher and your contribution to student learning.
1. Teaching Responsibility
Courses Taught
How you prepare this section will be determined by the purpose of the dossier, the number of different courses you have taught, the number of years you have been teaching, and the number of institutions at which you have taught.
When preparing for review or applying for promotion or tenure, check with your academic unit about expectations with regards to the number of years of teaching responsibility to include. If applying for an academic position, include teaching responsibility at all institutions. You may decide to use one or a combination of the following approaches
- Write a paragraph which summarizes the nature and range of your teaching roles and responsibilities and normal teaching load. Append a table of your teaching assignments.
- For each course, or selected courses which represent the range of your teaching responsibility, write a short paragraph that describes the course. Provide information about the goals, topics, and approaches to teaching, learning, and assessment. Append a table of your teaching assignments.
Notes:
- The table of teaching assignments should list courses taught in reverse chronological order by semester and year and identify courses by number and title. The table should include student enrollment and other relevant information such as: graduate/undergraduate level, required/elective, delivery mode, average student enrolment, if co-taught, teaching assistant roles and responsibilities.
- A few sample syllabi that represent the range of your teaching responsibility and approaches in the past three to five years is usually sufficient. It is not recommended that you include the syllabi from all courses you have taught. Indicate in the narrative which course syllabi are appended.
Examples of evidence:
table of teaching assignment over a period of years; sample course syllabi (1)
Student Supervision and Mentorship
Describe your goals for students and the structures, frameworks, or processes that define your approach to student supervision and mentorship. Highlight significant student achievements directly related to your supervision or mentorship.
In an appended table, list undergraduate and graduate students and postdoctoral scholars you have formally supervised and mentored. List them in reverse chronological order by start date and provide the titles of the papers or projects the students produced, indicate your role, and include any additional relevant information such as: status, honours or awards the student received, student publications and presentations, graduate school admission, current career position and name of employer.
Examples of evidence:
table of supervision and mentorship responsibility; written agreement made with students that guide mentorship and supervision activities; student achievement; comments from formal evaluations of supervision or mentorship; unsolicited informal feedback from students supervised or mentored; solicited and unsolicited letters of support from former students you are no longer teaching or supervising; reports from employers; description of award received for supervision; presentation or publication on supervision and mentoring (12, 34, 36)
2. Teaching Philosophy
A teaching philosophy is a one- to two-page statement about your values and beliefs about teaching and learning, why you hold those values and beliefs, and how you translate them into your teaching practice. Schönwetter, Sokal, Friesen, and Taylor (2010) describe developing a statement of teaching philosophy as “a complex process of gathering, assimilating, analysing, reflecting upon, and evaluating and adapting thoughts on effective teaching and learning” (p. 84).
You may include a brief overview of some of the teaching strategies you use that align with your beliefs but the purpose of the philosophy is to provide a foundation for your teaching practice that explains your goals for student learning and why you teach the way you do. The approaches and priorities you describe in your teaching philosophy should be reflected in the dossier content which follows.
Please see the resources on Writing a Teaching philosophy for more information.
3. Effectiveness in Teaching and Supporting Learning
In this section, be reflective and descriptive about your teaching activities, strengths, and accomplishments. Through the narrative you “make the intellectual work of teaching visible” (Goodburn, 2010). Be selective about the items you choose to include and, unless advised otherwise, focus your narrative on and select evidence from the most recent three to five years of teaching responsibility. The narrative should demonstrate your competence and creativity in teaching, and your ability to be self-reflective and critical. Your dossier will be strengthened if the categories of evidence discussed in this section reflect your teaching philosophy and if the claims you make about your teaching are supported by direct reference to evidence included in appendices.
Teaching Strategies
Think about your teaching strengths and describe a few of the particularly effective and creative or innovative strategies you use to assist students in achieving learning outcomes. For each, describe how the strategy is executed—what you do, what students do, and what resources are used. Identify the expected learning outcomes and explain why the strategy is effective and how it links to your teaching philosophy.
Examples of evidence:
any artifact related to the strategy described, for example, a handout; sequence of presentation slides; photos that capture learning experiences (with student permission); sample of student work (with permission); feedback from students on the strategy; a lesson plan that includes use of the strategy; and comments from teaching observation reports (8, 9, 16, 26, 27)
Individual student comments may be extracted from evaluations, emails, or other written feedback and used in the narrative to support what you say about a particular aspect of your teaching. If doing so, be sure to source the comment. Without using the student’s name, indicate that the comment was made by a student, indicate the course and semester, and how you received the comment (e.g., email, CEQ comment, or personal note or card).
Methods of Student Assessment
If you assess students using innovative strategies or methods not commonly used in your discipline, describe them and explain how the assessments are designed to match and measure specific learning outcomes and enhance student learning. Authentic assessment methods, methods that assess higher order cognitive skills, and assessments that offer students choice in how they demonstrate their learning are some methods of assessment that will be of interest to reviewers. Aspects of your approach to grading (e.g., the design and use of rubrics and opportunities for students to resubmit) and to providing feedback are also appropriate to include in this section.
Examples of evidence:
assignment description or instructions given to students; sample of or excerpt from a quiz or test; grading rubric; sample of student work that resulted from an assignment (with permission); feedback to students; excerpt from course outline; formal and informal feedback from colleagues on methods used (6, 8, 9)
Course and Instructional Materials Developed
Describe any original instructional materials or resources you developed (e.g., textbooks, student manuals, lab activities, case studies, experiential learning activities, and service learning components). For each resource, explain why you developed the resource, the context in which it is used, and its effect on student engagement and learning.
Examples of evidence:
the learning resource or material (in whole or in part); photographs or screenshots; student work that results from use of the resource (with permission); formal and informal feedback from students; peer review report (2, 24)
New Course Development and Course Redesign
Describe courses you conceptualized, developed, and delivered. Also describe substantial revisions you made in existing courses you were assigned. Explain the need for the new course or why you redesigned an existing one, briefly describe the process, and point out any special features of the course. Include information on how the course contributes to a program of study and the effects on student engagement and learning.
Examples of evidence:
course syllabus (original and revised if applicable); formal and informal feedback from students, colleagues, or academic administrators (18, 23, 29)
Feedback on and Evaluation of Courses and Teaching
In this section it is important to demonstrate that you receive feedback from students on their learning experiences in your courses, and that you value and use that feedback to make improvements in the remainder of the semester (if acquired during a course) or in anticipation of future offerings. In the narrative, describe feedback instruments and processes, explaining how and when they are administered. Point out what feedback indicates are your courses’ strengths and discuss changes or adjustments you have made or plan to make based on that feedback.
Peer review of teaching.
Peer review of teaching is a process by which you can obtain feedback for teaching development. Describe the peer review or peer observation process used, the focus or purpose of the observation, the feedback received, and your teaching development plan and any progress or improvement that resulted from the process.
CEQ data.
The Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is Memorial’s standard method of collecting student feedback on course learning experiences. CEQs are administered at the end of each semester, before the examination period begins. CEQ data can provide constructive information from students about learning experiences and inform academic administrators of students’ perceptions of teaching and learning.
Articles 10.30 and 11.14 of the collective agreement between Memorial University and the Faculty Association states: “Recommendations and decisions shall be based on the evaluation of documentation compiled by the Faculty Member following suggestions in the CAUT Teaching Dossier” (p. 39-p. 42). The CAUT Teaching Dossier strongly discourages using student feedback data, like that collected in the CEQ, when evaluating teaching (p. 6).
If you choose to include CEQ data, explain what you think students’ feedback says about your teaching, describe why you value students’ feedback, and connect students’ feedback to your larger processes for self-evaluation and teaching development. Provide the full reports in an appendix. Consider preceding the reports with a table that summarizes the data for the reviewer.
Instructor-designed mid-semester feedback.
Feedback on learning activities and course design can also be obtained from students throughout the semester. If you provide students with opportunities to share feedback on their learning experience mid-semester through informal questionnaires, feedback forms, or other activities, describe those instruments, their purpose, and the nature of the feedback you received.
Unsolicited feedback.
When students or colleagues send you unsolicited feedback in an email, card, or note, which speak directly to specific teaching practices and their impact on learning, you may summarize this feedback and provide a sample of these materials in an appendix.
Examples of evidence:
CEQ reports for the previous three years; blank copy of personally designed student feedback questionnaire or form; peer observation of teaching report; report on peer review of instructional materials; unsolicited feedback from students or colleagues that mention specific teaching practices and impact (26, 27, 28)
Teaching Awards and Recognitions
Awards or recognitions you received for your teaching, either from students, your academic unit, your institution, or an external agency, should be described in your dossier. Provide the award title and year received; identify the granting group, institution, or agency; describe the criteria for selection and eligible candidates; and identify who initiated the nomination.
Examples of evidence:
award citations; media clippings; photos from awards ceremonies; copies of award certificates (32)
4. Professional Learning and Development in Teaching
In this section, reflect on your responsibility to develop your teaching skill and be cognizant of current teaching practices in your discipline. Describe formal teaching development you have undertaken as well as what you routinely do to assess and improve your teaching, for example, attend teaching development workshops, solicit mid-semester feedback from students, have a peer observe and review your teaching, and record reflections about what worked and what didn’t. Note what you learned and the improvements or revisions you made to courses, teaching and learning activities, or instructional resources as a result of your teaching development activities.
Examples of evidence:
list of courses, workshops, seminars, communities of practice, and conferences on teaching and learning in which you participated; documents or products related to professional learning activities; teaching certificate earned; membership in teaching-related organizations; report from peer observation of teaching; student or peer comments that relate to practices that you implemented from professional learning activities; semester/annual reflective memo on learning, teaching strengths, and areas for growth (15, 16, 17, 20, 21)
5. Scholarship in Teaching and Learning
Include a description of activity in which, in your own teaching practice, you systematically examined teaching and learning processes or practices from a critical perspective and shared your work through presentations or publications. If you received a teaching innovation grant, describe your project and your dissemination activities. Describe also any experience you may have in editing teaching journals or being involved in the peer review of articles about teaching.
Examples of evidence:
list of publications and conference presentations on teaching and learning; abstracts or full-text articles on teaching and learning; list of teaching and learning, SoTL, or discipline-based educational research publications for which you have served as editor or peer reviewer; list and description of teaching and learning grants received (19, 25, 38)
6. Educational Leadership Philosophy
Educational leadership is not relegated to those in formal academic leadership positions. Depending on your career stage, your level of activity in educational leadership, and the purpose for which you are preparing the dossier, you may include a statement of your educational leadership philosophy. Like a teaching philosophy, an educational leadership philosophy is a one- to two-page statement about your values and beliefs about educational leadership, why you hold those beliefs, and how you translate them into practice. Kenny et al. (2021) recommend you structure your statement around four key components: beliefs, strategies, impact, and goals .
7. Teaching Leadership and Service
This section is a narrative about the ways in which you have offered leadership in creating a strong teaching and learning culture or community and in advancing teaching in your academic unit, institution, or professional association. If you are new to teaching and have not as yet accumulated significant evidence of your leadership capabilities, you may choose to omit this section as a discrete category and add the topic under Teaching Effectiveness.
Service in Academic Administration
If you served as an academic administrator and while in that position was responsible for any significant teaching and learning-related initiatives or accomplishments, describe them in this section.
Curriculum Development
Acknowledge any contribution you made to degree or program reviews, accreditation committees, new program development, or new instituted opportunities for student learning. If you have authored or co-authored a textbook or course manual for use by others in the institution or beyond, describe it here.
Examples of evidence:
textbook cover and table of contents; feedback from colleagues or administrators; proposals or reports (23, 24)
Service on Committees Related to Teaching and Learning
Describe your activity on any departmental, faculty/school, institutional, or national teaching-related committee or sub-group. For projects undertaken, describe the origins of the project, the goals, your role and contribution, as well as the overall impact of the project.
Examples of evidence:
any artifact from projects undertaken; feedback from colleagues or administrators; proposals or reports (31, 33)
Contribution to the Professional Development of Colleagues
Describe teaching workshops, seminars or other teaching development events for colleagues or graduate students, which you have designed and facilitated or organized.
Examples of evidence:
participant feedback; resources developed (14)
Mentoring of New Faculty and Other Colleagues
If you have participated in a mentoring program or have simply offered teaching assistance to others in your academic unit or institution, describe your activity in this section.
Examples of evidence:
solicited or unsolicited feedback from colleagues; letter from academic administrator; feedback to colleagues (14, 33)
Community Education
If you are involved in community outreach work which involves teaching the public about issues in your area, for example, raising awareness of good nutrition or preserving the environment, or if you are offering courses free of charge to those seeking a particular professional qualification, then mention it here. Describe requests you may have received from the media to educate the public about an issue in your discipline. If you are involved in outreach to schools, describe it here.
Examples of evidence:
photos or media clippings; resources developed (37, 39)
8. Teaching Goals
Look ahead and, in one or two brief paragraphs, describe your short- and long-term teaching-related goals as well as plans for projects or activities that will contribute to your growth and development as a teacher.
Appendices
Include evidence of your beliefs and the claims you made about your teaching in a set of appendices. All items included in the appendices should be clearly labeled and should be referenced in the narrative section of your dossier.
References
- Collective Agreement between Memorial University of Newfoundland and Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty Association, 2023-2026. Retrieved from: MUNFA Collective Agreement 2023-2026
- Goodburn, A. (December 3, 2010). Developing and evaluating teaching portfolios (online seminar), Academic Impressions.
- Kenny, N., Aparicio-Ting, F., Beattie, T., Berenson, C., Grant, K., Jeffs, C., Lindstrom, G., Nowell, L., & Usman, F. (2021). Teaching philosophies and teaching dossiers guide: Including leadership, mentorship, supervision, and EDI. Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning Guide Series. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/resources/teaching-philosophies-and-teaching-dossiers-guide
- Schonwetter, D., Sokal, L., Friesen, M., & Taylor, L. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. The International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 83-97. doi: 10.1080/13601440210156501
- Shore, B. M., Foster, S. F., Knapper, C. K., Nadeau, G. C., Neill, N., & Sim, V. W. (2018). CAUT Teaching Dossier. Canadian Association of University Teachers. https://www.caut.ca/sites/default/files/caut-teaching-dossier_2018-11_online_version.pdf.
Original resource developed by M. Dunne and A. Hajek, 2004. Revised: A. Hajek, 2012, 2016, 2018; M. Doyle, 2024.
Originally Published: July 12, 2024
Last Updated: July 16, 2024